Brian Armstrong is ready for a fight against the SEC.
While the exchange is unlikely to be in court anytime soon, the Wells notice informs Coinbase that SEC staff have made a preliminary determination to recommend an enforcement action against the firm for violations of federal Exchange and Securities Act violations.
Multiple Coinbase products are coming under regulatory scrutiny, including:
- An unidentified portion of listed digital assets;
- Coinbase Earn, the platform’s staking service;
- Coinbase Prime, an institutional custody and trading solution, and;
- Coinbase Wallet, a self-custodial wallet.
Following disclosure, $COIN took a nosedive, tumbling 20% off of Wednesday’s lows on the Thursday open. While the $COIN price already incorporates the impact of the Wells notice, the significance of the SEC’s actions on the broader crypto industry has yet to be seen. Coinbase appears intent on going to court and advocating for crypto clarity.
Previously on SEC v. Everyone
Gary Gensler went after Kraken’s staking service on February 9th, regulatory talons on full display. The crux of the SEC’s disagreement with Kraken appeared to be centered around the pooled nature of customer assets and yield to provide stable, regular payouts to users.
Kraken chose to settle with the SEC and the resulting $30M fine and shuttering of US staking operations accomplished nothing other than eliminating a convenient staking-as-a-service option for American retail consumers.
Coinbase took immediate steps to avoid similar enforcement action, clarifying in its terms of service that the firm is a service provider, connecting users with validators and protocols to pass through staking rewards, less a small fee, while requiring the unstaking of certain assets before sale or transfer.
A Pivotal Moment
American regulatory frameworks are set by legislation and legal precedent. Because Kraken chose to settle, no new regulation was created. With Coinbase intent on meeting the SEC in court, legal precedent will be set; the ramifications of failure are significant.
Nine months ago, the SEC began investigating Coinbase. In the following months, the two parties met over 30 times, with Coinbase soliciting feedback on its regulatory proposals in December 2022.
SEC staff anticipated issuing guidance in January, however, one day before their scheduled meeting, Coinbase was informed the agency would be pursuing an enforcement action. Receipt of a Wells notice does not necessarily mean the SEC will file an enforcement action, however, given Coinbase’s prior attempts to cooperate with the regulator, it is likely that we will see resolution through the judicial system.
While we are unlikely to receive specifics on the investigation at this time, it is troubling to see such a wide range of products coming under the SEC’s ire. Coinbase did not receive any specifics on which cryptocurrencies the SEC considers securities, however, digital assets referenced in SEC v. Wahi are likely encompassed, including the Rari and Ampleforth governance tokens.
Alterations to Coinbase Earn’s terms of service failed to satiate the regulators. The SEC may have set its sights on “pooled” rewards models and seek to fine Coinbase for past wrongs. A more sinister outlook, however, sees the SEC attempt to classify staking as a security and look to use its day in court to set such precedent.
Strangely, the SEC includes Coinbase Prime and Coinbase Wallet as products under investigation in its Wells notice. This marks the first regulatory inquisition targeting a licensed institutional custody solution and smart contract wallet. Potentially, a Coinbase failure to successfully defend these products in court could result in additional hurdles to both institutional and retail access to crypto markets.
Why the SEC is now choosing to raise questions remains unknown, yet, an SEC victory against Coinbase could set a detrimental precedent and hamstring crypto adoption in the US.
Son of Crypton
Fending off an army of SEC lawyers is expensive.
Just ask SushiSwap Head Chef Jared Grey. On March 21st, Sushi DAO and Grey were served with SEC subpoenas. Details are not disclosed, however, it is clear that the two parties are on the SEC’s naughty list.
Currently, the cash-strapped protocol’s CEO is looking to establish a $3M legal fund. Court proceedings are lengthy and lawyers are expensive; for many DAOs, including Sushi, battle against regulators creates a major financial strain.
Coinbase is one of the few crypto entities well-capitalized enough to take on the regulators. The firm has built up internal legal and policy departments, spending millions to craft proposals for quality crypto regulation.
They will be able to wage combat against the SEC in what is likely to be a protracted legal battle. Crypto needs firms like Coinbase to stand up to the SEC and engage with Washington.
While the laws of smart contracts are sufficient in DeFi, regulation is necessary to empower institutional adoption and foster retail comfort in the meatspace.
Coinbase’s refusal to become another pawn in Gensler’s power grab and their active participation in the legislative process is necessary to prevent adoption of harmful legal precedent and to craft positive-sum regulation that will benefit crypto and foster adoption. We salute your efforts, Coinbase
How Can I Help?
Not a multi-billion dollar crypto institution but still looking to fight the good fight and prevent regulatory overreach?
Crypto is people from the ground up; you are a component in the stack. However you contribute, be it sharing crypto resources with a friend or donating to organizations tirelessly defending crypto, you’re making an impact. We’ll have more tips and tricks to get involved in the newsletter tomorrow 😮
Anticipate more blood in the waters soon™. Our known battles are far from over and it is highly unlikely that we’ve seen the last victims of SEC enforcement action. Whatever you do, don’t stay silent: the regulatory assault is here and we need all hands on deck.